Saturday, July 15, 2006

Let's Decide on Evaluation Criteria

5 Comments:

At 6:27 PM, Blogger Wonderful said...

It is fine. It covers all the learning experience we have been through.

 
At 1:37 AM, Blogger Christina MLIM said...

I agree that Daniel's suggestion is fair because it matched the requirements mentioned at the beginning of module.

 
At 4:26 PM, Blogger Keith Ma said...

In my opinion, I agree with Peon, Kelvin and Christina. I think Daniel's suggestion is more fair because it closely matches the requirements we know before.

If the criteria weighting is changed, it is unfair and meaningless for busy people who still tried their best to meet the requirement before.

Also, I think the criteria should be based on what Daniel expects us to achieve, and should not be based on what we have already achieved.

Thus, I think "no change" is one of the good choices because it is difficult to please all suggestions unless everyone has a customized criteria.

 
At 5:59 PM, Blogger Daniel said...

Hi guys,

I am "listening" and please continue with your constructive inputs. Thanks to all of you who already contributed. I would love to hear others as well.

 
At 11:54 AM, Blogger Wonderful said...

I appreciate Chris has guts to express what he thinks. He has really expressed our voice about the difficulties as part-time students and teachers in the previous busy months despite we enjoy the learning very much. Thanks, Chris.

I find some opinions from Chris are impressing and meaningful.
For example,
“Quality is more important than speed.”
“Great ideas deserve more respect.”
“A good documentation is worth a thousand hours of debugging.”

I also find interesting and insightful when he drew an analogy between Daniel's learning objects and us which I have never thought of. Chris really has learnt a lot from the module.

Opening up this platform for discussion about such an sensitive issue, it is really a challenge with respect for us. Thanks. Daniel.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home